Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36166084›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Application of deep learning-based image reconstruction in MR imaging of the shoulder joint to improve image quality and reduce scan time.

Malwina Kaniewska, Eva Deininger-Czermak, Jonas M Getzmann, Xinzeng Wang, Maelene Lohezic, Roman Guggenberger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Malwina KaniewskaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. malwina.kaniewska@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-8415
Eva Deininger-CzermakInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas M GetzmannInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Xinzeng WangGlobal MR Applications & Workflow, GE Healthcare, Houston, TX, USA.
Maelene LohezicApplications & Workflow, GE Healthcare, Manchester, UK.
Roman GuggenbergerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHGE Global Research (United States) · USZurich University of Applied Sciences in Business Administration · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of conventional motion-corrected periodically rotated overlapping parallel line with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) MRI sequences with post-processed PROPELLER MRI sequences using deep learning-based (DL) reconstructions.

methodsIn this prospective study of 30 patients, conventional (19 min 18 s) and accelerated MRI sequences (7 min 16 s) using the PROPELLER technique were acquired. Accelerated sequences were post-processed using DL. The image quality and diagnostic confidence were qualitatively assessed by 2 readers using a 5-point Likert scale. Analysis of the pathological findings of cartilage, rotator cuff tendons and muscles, glenoid labrum and subacromial bursa was performed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa statistic. Quantitative evaluation of image quality was measured using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).

resultsMean image quality and diagnostic confidence in evaluation of all shoulder structures were higher in DL sequences (p value = 0.01). Inter-reader agreement ranged between kappa values of 0.155 (assessment of the bursa) and 0.947 (assessment of the rotator cuff muscles). In 17 cases, thickening of the subacromial bursa of more than 2 mm was only visible in DL sequences. The pathologies of the other structures could be properly evaluated by conventional and DL sequences. Mean SNR (p value = 0.01) and CNR (p value = 0.02) were significantly higher for DL sequences.

conclusionsThe accelerated PROPELLER sequences with DL post-processing showed superior image quality and higher diagnostic confidence compared to the conventional PROPELLER sequences. Subacromial bursa can be thoroughly assessed in DL sequences, while the other structures of the shoulder joint can be assessed in conventional and DL sequences with a good agreement between sequences. KEY POINTS: • MRI of the shoulder requires long scan times and can be hampered by motion artifacts. • Deep learning-based convolutional neural networks are used to reduce image noise and scan time while maintaining optimal image quality. The radial k-space acquisition technique (PROPELLER) can reduce the scan time and has potential to reduce motion artifacts. • DL sequences show a higher diagnostic confidence than conventional sequences and therefore are preferred for assessment of the subacromial bursa, while conventional and DL sequences show comparable performance in the evaluation of the shoulder joint.

Indexed as

Deep LearningShoulder JointArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesConvolutional neural networkDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadial k-space acquisitionShoulder joint

Identifiers

PMID36166084
PMCPMC9935676
OpenAlexW4297259465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.