Trial reportJAMA2022
Effect of First-Line Serplulimab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The ASTRUM-005 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 365 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of HLX10 in Combination With Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With ES-SCLC
A Single-center, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Serplulimab in Combination With Platinum-based Chemotherapy and Bayer Aspirin in Previously Untreated Patients With Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Efficacy and Safety of Metronomic Oral Paclitaxel Plus an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Induction in Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Multi-Cohort Exploratory Study
Who cites it
365 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 423 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Islet function impairment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-arm meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in advanced or recurrent small cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of B7-H3-targeted antibody-drug conjugates in previously treated small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a contextual comparison to topotecan.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy-related induction and maintenance therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on real-world data.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive value of serum cytokines in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving anti-PD-1 blockade therapy: a meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy or antiangiogenic agent-based treatment strategies versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of serplulimab in solid tumors: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Durvalumab plus anlotinib versus durvalumab alone as maintenance treatment in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (DURABLE): a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial and biomarker analysis.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Simplified perioperative serplulimab and chemotherapy for resectable squamous NSCLC: a phase II trial with biomarker analysis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Serplulimab Plus Chemotherapy, with or without HLX04, versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Nonsquamous NSCLC: Final Survival Analysis of the Phase III ASTRUM-002 Study.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Safety and efficacy of first-line iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (QL1706) plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (DUBHE-L-209).Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Serplulimab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (ASTRUM-CC01): a phase II trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- First-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Updated results and biomarker analysis from the ASTRUM-005 randomized clinical trial.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Trial
305 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has changed the approach to first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). It remained unknown whether adding a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor to chemotherapy provided similar or better benefits in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, which would add evidence on the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse event profile of the PD-1 inhibitor serplulimab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial (ASTRUM-005) enrolled patients at 114 hospital sites in 6 countries between September 12, 2019, and April 27, 2021. Of 894 patients who were screened, 585 with extensive-stage SCLC who had not previously received systemic therapy were randomized. Patients were followed up through October 22, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either 4.5 mg/kg of serplulimab (n = 389) or placebo (n = 196) intravenously every 3 weeks. All patients received intravenous carboplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks for up to 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (prespecified significance threshold at the interim analysis, 2-sided P < .012). There were 13 secondary outcomes, including progression-free survival and adverse events. Results: Among the 585 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 8.67] years; 104 [17.8%] women), 246 (42.1%) completed the trial and 465 (79.5%) discontinued study treatment. All patients received study treatment and were included in the primary analyses. As of the data cutoff (October 22, 2021) for this interim analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 12.3 months (range, 0.2-24.8 months). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the serplulimab group (15.4 months [95% CI, 13.3 months-not evaluable]) than in the placebo group (10.9 months [95% CI, 10.0-14.3 months]) (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.82]; P < .001). The median progression-free survival (assessed by an independent radiology review committee) also was longer in the serplulimab group (5.7 months [95% CI, 5.5-6.9 months]) than in the placebo group (4.3 months [95% CI, 4.2-4.5 months]) (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.38-0.59]). Treatment-related adverse events that were grade 3 or higher occurred in 129 patients (33.2%) in the serplulimab group and in 54 patients (27.6%) in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC, serplulimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone, supporting the use of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for this patient population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04063163.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.