ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022
Patient co-design of digital health storytelling tools for multimorbidity: A phenomenological study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- eHealth Approaches to Multimorbidity Management: Scoping Review of Interventions and Multidisease Strategies.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Review
- Transitioning Perspectives in Digital Health Through Phenomenology Integration.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Patient co-design of digital health storytelling tools for multimorbidity: A phenomenological study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterest in both narrative medicine and electronic health records has increased over the past 30 years. However, electronic health records are mainly written by and for clinicians, and the patient narrative and voice are not incorporated. Recent studies within the United Kingdom have indicated that there is a need to incorporate patient stories into health records, to improve quality and continuity of care. This is particularly important when treating people with multiple long-term health conditions (multimorbidity), whose health stories can be particularly complex.
objectiveTo understand the goals and requirements of people with multimorbidity for digital health storytelling tools.
methodsThe methodology uses narrative within a phenomenological approach to inform a process of co-design.
resultsThe findings indicate that people living with multimorbidity would use health storytelling tools to understand and reflect on their journeys, convey their experiences to others and advocate for themselves against scepticism.
conclusionOutputs from the project give insight into the lived experience of multimorbidity, as well as understanding the goals of people living with multimorbidity for using health storytelling tools as part of treatment and self-management. Future research could explore other areas such as collaborative health storytelling or the technical implementation of tools. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Five adults with multiple long-term conditions participated in the project, and research was carried out in three stages. First, semistructured interviews were used to understand each participant's health story. Second, each participant worked with the researcher to co-design a visual representation of their story. Finally, digital prototypes based on their health story were reviewed with each of the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.