Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36164818›Full record

ReviewMolecular microbiology2022

Signals triggering prophage induction in the gut microbiota.

Caroline Henrot, Marie-Agnès Petit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The OMMGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Remodelling of the gut virome after long-term fasting.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prophage diversity in poultry-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline HenrotUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Marie-Agnès PetitUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-2768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to bacteria of the gut microbiota, bacteriophages are still poorly characterised, and their physiological importance is far less known. Temperate phages are probably a major actor in the gut, as it is estimated that 80% of intestinal bacteria are lysogens, meaning that they are carrying prophages. In addition, prophage induction rates are higher in the gut than in vitro. However, studies on the signals leading to prophage induction have essentially focused on genotoxic agents with poor relevance for this environment. In this review, we sum up recent findings about signals able to trigger prophage induction in the gut. Three categories of signals are at play: those originating from interactions between intestinal microbes, those from the human or animal host physiology and those from external intakes. These recent results highlight the diversity of factors influencing prophage induction in the gut, and start to unveil ways by which microbiota composition may be modulated.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsHumansLysogenyProphagesVirus Activationgastro-intestinal tracttemperate bacteriophage

Identifiers

PMID36164818
PMCPMC9827884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.