Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36164651›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

A structure and evolutionary-based classification of solute carriers.

Evandro Ferrada, Giulio Superti-Furga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A large-scale evolutionary and structural analysis of CLC channels and transporters.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Allosteric effects of the coupling cation in melibiose transporter MelB.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evandro FerradaCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Lazarettgasse 14, AKH BT 25.3, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Giulio Superti-FurgaCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Lazarettgasse 14, AKH BT 25.3, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solute carriers are an operationally defined diverse family of membrane proteins involved in the transport of nutrients, metabolites, xenobiotics, and drugs. Here, we provide an integrative classification of solute carriers by combining evolutionary information with proteome-wide structure models recently made available through the AlphaFold resource. Analyses of orthologous relations among 455 protein-coding genes currently classified as human solute carriers, over the fully sequenced genomes of 2,100 species, suggest no more than approximately 180 independent evolutionary origins. Structural comparative analyses provided further insight revealing a total of 24 structurally distinct transmembrane folds, increasing by approximately 40% the number of previously described SLC structural folds. In addition, a structural comparative analysis identified a new human solute carrier member and revealed details of noncanonical ones. Our analyses uncover new ancestral relations between solute carrier genes, provide insights into the evolution of remote homologs and a platform to test hypotheses of functional deorphanization.

Indexed as

BiochemistryBiological sciencesClassification of proteinsEvolutionary biology

Identifiers

PMID36164651
PMCPMC9508557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.