Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36164581›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Expert Panel Consensus for Addressing Anti-VEGF Treatment Challenges of Diabetic Macular Edema in Spain.

José Ignacio Fernández-Vigo, Inés Contreras, María José Crespo, Carlos Beckford, Ignacio Flores-Moreno, Rosario Cobo-Soriano, Jesús Pareja, María Dolores Martín, Luis Moreno, Luis Arrevola-Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-world therapy and persistence of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema: a German claims data analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

José Ignacio Fernández-VigoDeparment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Inés ContrerasDeparment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS) and Clínica Rementería, Madrid, Spain.
María José CrespoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos BeckfordDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Flores-MorenoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Rosario Cobo-SorianoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Henares, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús ParejaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María Dolores MartínDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Luis MorenoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Arrevola-VelascoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinica Baviera Instituto Oftalmológico Europeo, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) has evolved rapidly in the past decade, highlighting the need to address the challenges of routine clinical practice decision-making through expert consensus agreements. Methods: After a literature review and discussion of real-world experience on DME management, a group of ten retina specialists agreed on a consensus of recommendations for the most appropriate management of DME patients using vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) in Spain. Results: The panel recommended early treatment initiation in DME patients with worse baseline visual acuity (VA) to maintain or improve outcome. For patients with good VA, an observation strategy was recommended, considering the presence of diabetic retinopathy, optical coherence tomography biomarkers, and impact on patient's quality of life. Based on the available evidence and clinical experience, the panel recommended the use of anti-VEGF intensive loading doses with the objective of achieving anatomic and visual responses as soon as possible, followed by a Treat & Extend (T&E) strategy to maintain VA improvement. Aflibercept was recommended for patients with a baseline decimal VA <0.5, followed by a T&E strategy, including the possibility to extend frequency of injections up to 16 weeks. Conclusion: An expert panel proposes a consensus for the management of DME in Spain. Early treatment initiation with anti-VEGF in DME patients is recommended to maintain or improve VA; aflibercept is recommended for patients with a poor baseline VA.

Indexed as

clinical practice patternsconsensusdiabetic macular edemaintravitreal injections

Identifiers

PMID36164581
PMCPMC9507974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.