ArticleMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2022
Giant mediastinal teratoma in a young infant: a case report.
Article in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior Mediastinal Mature Teratoma Presenting With Mediastinal Mass Syndrome in a Six-Month-Old Infant: Diagnostic Pitfalls and Anesthetic Challenges.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Giant Mediastinal Teratoma in a Child: A Case Report With a Brief Review of the Literature.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Thoracoscopic Resection of a Mediastinal Mature Cystic Teratoma in a Two-month-Old Infant: A Case Report and Literature Review.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Airway Management for Massive Anterior Mediastinal Tumor Resection in an Infant: A Strategy Involving Spontaneous Breathing-Preserving Endotracheal Intubation under Intravenous Anesthesia.Case reports in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Perioperative strategies and management of giant anterior mediastinal tumors: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant mediastinal tumors in the pediatric population can pose unique challenges for resection such as cardiovascular collapse on induction of anesthesia and injury to surrounding structures that may be compressed, displaced, or invaded by the mass. Principles that must be borne in mind during removal of giant mediastinal masses include: appropriate cross-sectional imaging to define extent of mass; airway control during induction of anesthesia; a multidisciplinary collaborative approach including cardiothoracic surgery; preparation for urgent sternotomy; plan for peripheral cannulation to institute cardiopulmonary bypass if needed; preservation of neurovasculature structures during dissection; complete resection whenever possible. While complete resection is desirable and results in an excellent prognosis, it may not be achievable especially if the tumor encases coronary arteries, and it is acceptable to leave small amounts of tumor behind. Case Description: Here we present a case describing surgical management of a giant mediastinal teratoma in a two-month-old female. The patient was found to have a large mediastinal mass during workup for cough and noisy breathing. She underwent preoperative echocardiogram demonstrating normal cardiac function followed by uncomplicated, open resection of the mass. Conclusions: Giant mediastinal tumors give rise to unique challenges for resection in small infants. The principles of airway control, preparation for urgent sternotomy, preparation for peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass cannulation, and preservation of neurovasculature during dissection must be borne in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.