Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36164351›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2022

Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors.

Lewis Stetson Rowles, Victoria L Morgan, Yalin Li, Xinyi Zhang, Shion Watabe, Tyler Stephen, Hannah A C Lohman, Derek DeSouza, Jeff Hallowell, Roland D Cusick and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lewis Stetson RowlesInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-9179
Victoria L MorganInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Yalin LiInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-4758
Xinyi ZhangDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5858-9511
Shion WatabeDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Tyler StephenDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Hannah A C LohmanDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8600-7235
Derek DeSouzaBiomass Controls PBC, Woodstock, Connecticut 06281, United States.
Jeff HallowellBiomass Controls PBC, Woodstock, Connecticut 06281, United States.
Roland D CusickDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-2939
Jeremy S GuestInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-2579

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03-0.08] USD·cap

Identifiers

PMID36164351
PMCPMC9502014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.