Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163547›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2023

Real-time denoising enables high-sensitivity fluorescence time-lapse imaging beyond the shot-noise limit.

Xinyang Li, Yixin Li, Yiliang Zhou, Jiamin Wu, Zhifeng Zhao, Jiaqi Fan, Fei Deng, Zhaofa Wu, Guihua Xiao, Jing He and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Xinyang Li *Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-5448
Yixin Li *Institute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yiliang ZhouDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jiamin WuDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-1026
Zhifeng ZhaoDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jiaqi FanTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Fei DengState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhaofa WuState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-5194
Guihua XiaoDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jing HeDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yuanlong ZhangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Guoxun ZhangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiaowan HuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.
Xingye ChenDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-9397
Hui QiaoDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-8657
Hao XieDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yulong LiState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University School of Life Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9166-9919
Haoqian WangTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China. wanghaoqian@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-8469
Lu FangInstitute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. fanglu@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-0367
Qionghai DaiDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. qhdai@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-3061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in fluorescence microscopy is the photon shot noise arising from the inevitable stochasticity of photon detection. Noise increases measurement uncertainty and limits imaging resolution, speed and sensitivity. To achieve high-sensitivity fluorescence imaging beyond the shot-noise limit, we present DeepCAD-RT, a self-supervised deep learning method for real-time noise suppression. Based on our previous framework DeepCAD, we reduced the number of network parameters by 94%, memory consumption by 27-fold and processing time by a factor of 20, allowing real-time processing on a two-photon microscope. A high imaging signal-to-noise ratio can be acquired with tenfold fewer photons than in standard imaging approaches. We demonstrate the utility of DeepCAD-RT in a series of photon-limited experiments, including in vivo calcium imaging of mice, zebrafish larva and fruit flies, recording of three-dimensional (3D) migration of neutrophils after acute brain injury and imaging of 3D dynamics of cortical ATP release. DeepCAD-RT will facilitate the morphological and functional interrogation of biological dynamics with a minimal photon budget.

Indexed as

PhotonsZebrafishAnimalsMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceSignal-To-Noise RatioTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID36163547
PMCPMC9931589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.