Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163472›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

An in vitro fermentation model to study the impact of bacteriophages targeting Shiga toxin-encoding Escherichia coli on the colonic microbiota.

Graça Pinto, Sudarshan A Shetty, Erwin G Zoetendal, Raquel F S Gonçalves, Ana C Pinheiro, Carina Almeida, Joana Azeredo, Hauke Smidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacteriophage Sf14 survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Demonstration of phage inhibitory action againstFrontiers in antibiotics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Establishment of porcine fecal-derivedBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Graça PintoCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-7553
Sudarshan A ShettyLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-9915
Erwin G ZoetendalLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7149-0727
Raquel F S GonçalvesCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9806-8147
Ana C PinheiroCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Carina AlmeidaCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Joana AzeredoCEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal. jazeredo@deb.uminho.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-5180-7133
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. hauke.smidt@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-5026
University of Minho · PTWageningen University & Research · NLUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lytic bacteriophages are considered safe for human consumption as biocontrol agents against foodborne pathogens, in particular in ready-to-eat foodstuffs. Phages could, however, evolve to infect different hosts when passing through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). This underlines the importance of understanding the impact of phages towards colonic microbiota, particularly towards bacterial families usually found in the colon such as the Enterobacteriaceae. Here we propose in vitro batch fermentation as model for initial safety screening of lytic phages targeting Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). As inoculum we used faecal material of three healthy donors. To assess phage safety, we monitored fermentation parameters, including short chain fatty acid production and gas production/intake by colonic microbiota. We performed shotgun metagenomic analysis to evaluate the outcome of phage interference with colonic microbiota composition and functional potential. During the 24 h incubation, concentrations of phage and its host were also evaluated. We found the phage used in this study, named E. coli phage vB_EcoS_Ace (Ace), to be safe towards human colonic microbiota, independently of the donors' faecal content used. This suggests that individuality of donor faecal microbiota did not interfere with phage effect on the fermentations. However, the model revealed that the attenuated STEC strain used as phage host perturbed the faecal microbiota as based on metagenomic analysis, with potential differences in metabolic output. We conclude that the in vitro batch fermentation model used in this study is a reliable safety screening for lytic phages intended to be used as biocontrol agents.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesEscherichia coli InfectionsMicrobiotaShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliColiphagesColonFermentationHumansShiga ToxinShiga Toxin

Identifiers

PMID36163472
PMCPMC9512901
OpenAlexW4297236218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.