ArticleScientific reports2022
Study on protective performance and gradient optimization of helmet foam liner under bullet impact.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance evaluation of eco-friendly water hyacinth fiber-reinforced epoxy composites for lightweight protective helmet shell applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Autopsy findings in victims of gunshot injuries: wound ballistic considerations based on test shots to simulants and composite models.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- A cellulosic fibre foam as a bicycle helmet impact liner for brain injury mitigation in oblique impacts.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Research Progress on Helmet Liner Materials and Structural Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protective equipment in war plays a vital role in the safety of soldiers, the threat to soldiers from brain damage caused by deformation at the back of the helmet cannot be ignored, so research on reduce blunt post-cranial injury has great significance and value. This study first conducted gunshot experiments, used rifle bullets impact bulletproof plate and different density liner foam to record the incident process and internal response of craniocerebral model. After verifying the accuracy of finite element model through experimental data, optimization model is established based on response surface method to optimize the structure of gradient foam, analyze the cranial strain and energy absorption to select the best density and thickness distribution of each foam layer. Optimization results show that liner foam which designed to have lower density and thicker thickness for impact and brace layers, higher density and thinner thickness for middle layer can significantly improve the energy absorption efficiency. Compared to the 40.65 J of energy absorption before optimization, the optimized gradient foam can absorb 109.3 J of energy, with a 169% increase in the absorption ratio. The skull strain in the craniocerebral model was reduced from 1.260 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.