ArticleCell discovery2022
SFRP4
Article in Cell discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostaglandin E2-mediated aging microenvironment fuels pathogenic fibrosis in cesarean section scar defect.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- HMMRCell discovery · 2026Article
- Postbiotic-Based Regenerative Therapy for Intrauterine Adhesions: Mechanisms, Microbiota Crosstalk, and Translational Perspectives.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Endothelial cell heterogeneity drives angiogenesis in endometriosis: mechanisms and emerging organoid-based models.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Platelet-derived vesicles restore fertility in endometrial injury by modulating the endometrial immune niche in mice.Science advances · 2026Article
- Single cell multiomics revealed fibrotic trajectories of endometrial cells and interaction with the pro-fibrotic macrophages in intrauterine adhesion.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Role of CTGF-LRP1 in impaired healing of cesarean section incisions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances and challenges of endometrial organoids in modeling endometrial function: basic, clinical, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Integrative circRNA landscape of intrauterine adhesions: putative ceRNA axes and circRNA-associated splicing usage linked to contractility and immunity.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Microfluidic chip-integrated vascularized endometrial complexes: Mitochondrial function and paracrine crosstalk enhance regenerative potential.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Unlocking the Secrets of the Endometrium: Stem Cells, Niches and Modern Methodologies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Significance of Midkine Signaling in Women's Cancers: Novel Biomarker and Therapeutic Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the human endometrium of patients with intrauterine adhesions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced myofibroblast differentiation of eMSCs in intrauterine adhesions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Multi-omics-based mapping of decidualization resistance in patients with a history of severe preeclampsia.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Surface Molecular Markers for the Isolation of Viable Fibroblast Subpopulations in the Female Reproductive Tract: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Varied cellular abnormalities in thin vs. normal endometrium in recurrent implantation failure by single-cell transcriptomics.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Dynamics of Estrogen and Progesterone Signaling in the Endometrium: An Overview.Cells · 2024Review
- Restoration of functional endometrium in an intrauterine adhesion rat model with endometrial stromal cells transplantation.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Endometriosis Revealed Using Omics Data.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of full-thickness endometrial regeneration after injury is limited by an incomplete molecular characterization of the cell populations responsible for the organ functions. To help fill this knowledge gap, we characterized 10,551 cells of full-thickness normal human uterine from two menstrual phases (proliferative and secretory phase) using unbiased single cell RNA-sequencing. We dissected cell heterogeneity of main cell types (epithelial, stromal, endothelial, and immune cells) of the full thickness uterine tissues, cell population architectures of human uterus cells across the menstrual cycle. We identified an SFRP4
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.