Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163257›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

The likely extinction of hundreds of palm species threatens their contributions to people and ecosystems.

S Bellot, Y Lu, A Antonelli, W J Baker, J Dransfield, F Forest, W D Kissling, I J Leitch, E Nic Lughadha, I Ondo and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Futureproofing Europe's forests.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Pressed for space.Nature plants · 2023
    Article
  7. Ecoinformatics for conservation biology.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S BellotRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK. s.bellot@kew.org.
Y LuRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
A AntonelliRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
W J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
J DransfieldRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
F ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
W D KisslingInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
I J LeitchRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
E Nic LughadhaRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
I OndoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
S PirononRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
B E WalkerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
R Cámara-LeretDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. rodrigo.camaraleret@ieu.uzh.ch.
S P BachmanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting nature's contributions to people requires accelerating extinction risk assessment and better integrating evolutionary, functional and used diversity with conservation planning. Here, we report machine learning extinction risk predictions for 1,381 palm species (Arecaceae), a plant family of high socio-economic and ecological importance. We integrate these predictions with published assessments for 508 species (covering 75% of all palm species) and we identify top-priority regions for palm conservation on the basis of their proportion of threatened evolutionarily distinct, functionally distinct and used species. Finally, we explore palm use resilience to identify non-threatened species that could potentially serve as substitutes for threatened used species by providing similar products. We estimate that over a thousand palms (56%) are probably threatened, including 185 species with documented uses. Some regions (New Guinea, Vanuatu and Vietnam) emerge as top ten priorities for conservation only after incorporating machine learning extinction risk predictions. Potential substitutes are identified for 91% of the threatened used species and regional use resilience increases with total palm richness. However, 16 threatened used species lack potential substitutes and 30 regions lack substitutes for at least one of their threatened used palm species. Overall, we show that hundreds of species of this keystone family face extinction, some of them probably irreplaceable, at least locally. This highlights the need for urgent actions to avoid major repercussions on palm-associated ecosystem processes and human livelihoods in the coming decades.

Indexed as

ArecaceaeEcosystemAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesHumansPlants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.