Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163192›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Nocturnal plant respiration is under strong non-temperature control.

Dan Bruhn, Freya Newman, Mathilda Hancock, Peter Povlsen, Martijn Slot, Stephen Sitch, John Drake, Graham P Weedon, Douglas B Clark, Majken Pagter and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Addressing the day-night divide.Journal of experimental botany · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modelling Net COPhysiologia plantarum
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dan BruhnDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. db@bio.aau.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9811-9194
Freya NewmanFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy', University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-7429
Mathilda HancockFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy', University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-4505
Peter PovlsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-2035
Martijn SlotSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa Ancon, Republic of Panama.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-1792
Stephen SitchFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy', University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-8561
John DrakeDepartment of Sustainable Resources Management, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, USA.
Graham P WeedonMet Office, Wallingford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-9984
Douglas B ClarkUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-7922
Majken PagterDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-1508
Richard J EllisUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9667-7478
Mark G TjoelkerHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-5238
Kelly M AndersenNanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-9904
Zorayda Restrepo CorreaGrupo Servicios ecosistemicos y cambio climático (SECC), Corporación COL-TREE, Medellin, Colombia.
Patrick C McGuireUniversity of Reading, Department of Meteorology and National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6592-4966
Lina M MercadoFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy', University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. l.mercado@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4069-0838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most biological rates depend on the rate of respiration. Temperature variation is typically considered the main driver of daily plant respiration rates, assuming a constant daily respiration rate at a set temperature. Here, we show empirical data from 31 species from temperate and tropical biomes to demonstrate that the rate of plant respiration at a constant temperature decreases monotonically with time through the night, on average by 25% after 8 h of darkness. Temperature controls less than half of the total nocturnal variation in respiration. A new universal formulation is developed to model and understand nocturnal plant respiration, combining the nocturnal decrease in the rate of plant respiration at constant temperature with the decrease in plant respiration according to the temperature sensitivity. Application of the new formulation shows a global reduction of 4.5 -6 % in plant respiration and an increase of 7-10% in net primary production for the present-day.

Indexed as

Plant LeavesPlantsCarbon DioxideEcosystemRespirationTemperatureTreesCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID36163192
PMCPMC9512894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.