Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163181›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2022

Can clinician champions reduce potentially inappropriate medications in people living with dementia? Study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Michael L Parchman, Jennifer Perloff, Grant Ritter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05359679 (Impact Collaboratory Transforming Dementia Care - Can Value Champions Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing for People With Dementia?), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05359679 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact Collaboratory Transforming Dementia Care - Can Value Champions Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing for People With Dementia?

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2023 to 2023Enrolled3,300ConditionsDementia, Med: DementiaArmsValue Champion Training Program, No Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael L ParchmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. michael.x.parchman@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2889
Jennifer PerloffBrandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Grant RitterBrandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
American Health Care Association · USBrandeis University · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Vincent Mor · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor people living with dementia (PLWD) the overuse of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) remains a persistent problem. De-prescribing trials in the elderly have mixed results. Clinician champions may be uniquely suited to lead efforts to address this challenge. Here we describe the study protocol for a 24-month embedded pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial within two accountable care organizations (ACOs) of such a clinician champion intervention. The specific aims are to (1) assess the effectiveness of a clinician champion on de-implementing PIMs in PLWD, (2) determine if the intervention is associated with a reduction in emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations attributed to a fall, and (3) examine five implementation outcomes: appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and equity. METHODS/

designTwo ACOs agreed to participate: United States Medical Management (USMM) and Oschner Health System. The unit of randomization will be the primary care clinic. A clinician champion will be recruited from each of the intervention clinics to participate in a 6-month training program and then work with clinicians and staff in their clinic for 12 months to reduce the use of PIMs in their PLWD population. For aims 1 and 2, Medicare claims data will be used to assess outcomes. The outcome for aim #1 will be medication possession rates per quarter, for the three therapeutic classes of PIMs among patients with dementia in intervention clinics versus control clinics. For aim #2, we will assess the incidence of falls using a previously validated algorithm. For both aims 1 and 2, we will construct hierarchical models with time period observations nested within patient using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with robust standard errors. The key variable of interest will be the treatment indicator assigned based on practice. For aim #3, we will conduct qualitative thematic analysis of documentation by the clinician champions in their project workbooks to evaluate the five implementation outcomes. DISCUSSION: This embedded pragmatic trial will add to our existing knowledge regarding the effectiveness of a clinician champion strategy to de-prescribe potentially inappropriate medication among patients with dementia as well as its appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and equity.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05359679 , Registered May 4, 2022.

Indexed as

DementiaPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAccidental FallsAgedHumansInappropriate PrescribingMedicarePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesDe-implementationDementiaDe-prescribingImplementation scienceLow-valueOveruse

Identifiers

PMID36163181
PMCPMC9513870
OpenAlexW4297103176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.