ArticleBioData mining2022
Interpretable recurrent neural network models for dynamic prediction of the extubation failure risk in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.
Article in BioData mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A temporal deep learning algorithm for prediction of extubation failures in critical care patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Feature selection methodology based on explainable AI: application in predicting extubation success in the intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FIRST-ICU: forecasting interventions and risk stratification in the ICU using graph neural network autoencoders.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- On the Importance of a Clear Definition of Time Horizon for Time-to-Event Dynamic Predictions: A Systematic Review and a Concrete Illustration in Kidney Transplantation.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Early Prediction of Adverse Events in Intensive Care Units Using Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- RMS: a ML-based system for ICU respiratory monitoring and resource planning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Using ML techniques to predict extubation outcomes for patients with central nervous system injuries in the Yun-Gui Plateau.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Key Concepts in Machine Learning and Clinical Applications in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit via machine learning: a COVID-19 perspective.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning for Early Discrimination Between Lung Cancer and Benign Nodules Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Observational
- Machine learning-based risk prediction model construction of difficult weaning in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A machine learning model for early candidemia prediction in the intensive care unit: Clinical application.PloS one · 2024Article
- An artificial intelligence system to predict the optimal timing for mechanical ventilation weaning for intensive care unit patients: A two-stage prediction approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in intensive care unit nursing: A narrative review (2020-2025).Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical decision of extubation is a challenge in the treatment of patient with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), since existing extubation protocols are not capable of precisely predicting extubation failure (EF). This study aims to develop and validate interpretable recurrent neural network (RNN) models for dynamically predicting EF risk.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on IMV patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Time series with a 4-h resolution were built for all included patients. Two types of RNN models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and the gated recurrent unit (GRU), were developed. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to select key features for developing light-version RNN models. The RNN models were compared to other five non-temporal machine learning models. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) value was applied to explain the influence of the features on model prediction.
resultsOf 8,599 included patients, 2,609 had EF (30.3%). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of LSTM and GRU showed no statistical difference on the test set (0.828 vs. 0.829). The light-version RNN models based on the 26 features selected out of a total of 89 features showed comparable performance as their corresponding full-version models. Among the non-temporal models, only the random forest (RF) (AUROC: 0.820) and the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model (AUROC: 0.823) were comparable to the RNN models, but their calibration was deviated.
conclusionsThe RNN models have excellent predictive performance for predicting EF risk and have potential to become real-time assistant decision-making systems for extubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.