Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163063›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2022

Interpretable recurrent neural network models for dynamic prediction of the extubation failure risk in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.

Zhixuan Zeng, Xianming Tang, Yang Liu, Zhengkun He, Xun Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhixuan ZengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xianming TangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhengkun HeSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xun GongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. gongxun1246@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical decision of extubation is a challenge in the treatment of patient with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), since existing extubation protocols are not capable of precisely predicting extubation failure (EF). This study aims to develop and validate interpretable recurrent neural network (RNN) models for dynamically predicting EF risk.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on IMV patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Time series with a 4-h resolution were built for all included patients. Two types of RNN models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and the gated recurrent unit (GRU), were developed. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to select key features for developing light-version RNN models. The RNN models were compared to other five non-temporal machine learning models. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) value was applied to explain the influence of the features on model prediction.

resultsOf 8,599 included patients, 2,609 had EF (30.3%). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of LSTM and GRU showed no statistical difference on the test set (0.828 vs. 0.829). The light-version RNN models based on the 26 features selected out of a total of 89 features showed comparable performance as their corresponding full-version models. Among the non-temporal models, only the random forest (RF) (AUROC: 0.820) and the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model (AUROC: 0.823) were comparable to the RNN models, but their calibration was deviated.

conclusionsThe RNN models have excellent predictive performance for predicting EF risk and have potential to become real-time assistant decision-making systems for extubation.

Indexed as

Dynamic predictionExtubation failureInvasive mechanical ventilationRecurrent neural networkShapley additive explanations valueTime series

Identifiers

PMID36163063
PMCPMC9513908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.