Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163044›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on maternal psychological status, the couple's relationship and mother-child interaction: a prospective study.

Sylvie Viaux-Savelon, Paul Maurice, Alexandra Rousseau, Chloe Leclere, Manon Renout, Laura Berlingo, David Cohen, Jean-Marie Jouannic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366817 (Psychological Impact of the Lockdown on Patients Giving Birth During the COVID-19 Epidemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366817 nacompletednot on this map

Psychological Impact of the Lockdown on Patients Giving Birth During the COVID-19 Epidemic

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2021Enrolled287ConditionsPost Partum DepressionArmspsychological assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sylvie Viaux-SavelonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Paul MauriceFetal Medicine Department, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France.
Alexandra RousseauAP-HP.Sorbonne Université, URCEST, Paris, France.
Chloe LeclereAP-HP.Sorbonne, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Manon RenoutDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Laura BerlingoAP-HP.Sorbonne, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
David CohenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Jean-Marie JouannicFetal Medicine Department, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France. Jean-marie.jouannic@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the rate of postpartum depression (PPD) during the first COVID-19 lockdown with the rate observed prior to the pandemic, and to examine factors associated with PPD.

methodsThis was a prospective study. Women who gave birth during the first COVID-19 lockdown (spring 2020) were offered call-interviews at 10 days and 6-8 weeks postpartum to assess PPD using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Post-traumatic symptoms (Perinatal Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire, PPQ), couple adjustment, and interaction and mother-to-infant bonding were also evaluated. The observed PPD rate was compared to the one reported before the pandemic. Factors associated with an increased risk of PPD were studied. The main outcome measures were comparison of the observed PPD rate (EPDS score > 12) to pre-pandemic rate.

resultsOf the 164 women included, 27 (16.5% [95%CI: 11.14-23.04]) presented an EPDS score > 12 either at 10 days or 6-8 weeks postpartum. This rate was similar to the one of 15% reported prior to the pandemic (p = 0.6). Combined EPDS> 12 or PPQ > 6 scores were observed in 20.7% of the mothers [95%CI: 14.8-0.28]. Maternal hypertension/preeclampsia (p = 0.007), emergency cesarean section (p = 0.03), and neonatal complications (p = 0.008) were significantly associated with an EPDS> 12 both in univariate and multivariate analysis (OR = 10 [95%CI: 1.5-68.7], OR = 4.09[95%CI: 1.2-14], OR = 4.02[95%CI: 1.4-11.6], respectively).

conclusionsThe rate of major PPD in our population did not increase during the first lockdown period. However, 20.7% of the women presented with post-traumatic/depressive symptoms.

trial registrationNCT04366817.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Depression, PostpartumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterpersonal RelationsMaleMother-Child RelationsPregnancyProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsAnxietyCovid-19DepressionLockdownMother-child interactionPost-traumatic stressPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36163044
PMCPMC9510719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.