Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36163036›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Practice characteristics influencing variation in provision of depression care in general practice in Norway; a registry-based cohort study (The Norwegian GP-DEP study).

Sharline Riiser, Valborg Baste, Inger Haukenes, Tone Smith-Sivertsen, Øystein Hetlevik, Sabine Ruths

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sharline RiiserResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway. sharline.riiser@uib.no.
Valborg BasteResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Inger HaukenesResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Tone Smith-SivertsenResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Øystein HetlevikResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Sabine RuthsResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Norwegian Research Fund for General Practice PhD grant to SRIResearch Council of Norway 287884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing evidence of variation in treatment for patients with depression, not only across patient characteristics, but also with respect to the organizational and structural framework of general practitioners' (GPs') practice. However, the reasons for these variations are sparsely examined. This study aimed to investigate associations of practice characteristics with provision of depression care in general practices in Norway.

methodsA nationwide cohort study of residents aged ≥ 18 years with a new depression episode in general practice during 2009-2015, based on linked registry data. Exposures were characteristics of GP practice: geographical location, practice list size, and duration of GP-patient relationship. Outcomes were talking therapy, antidepressant medication and sick listing provided by GP during 12 months from date of diagnosis. Associations between exposure and outcome were estimated using generalized linear models, adjusted for patients' age, gender, education and immigrant status, and characteristics of GP practice.

resultsThe study population comprised 285 113 patients, mean age 43.5 years, 61.6% women. They were registered with 5 574 GPs. Of the patients, 52.5% received talking therapy, 34.1% antidepressant drugs and 54.1% were sick listed, while 17.3% received none of the above treatments. Patients in rural practices were less likely to receive talking therapy (adjusted relative risk (adj RR) = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-0.73) and more likely to receive antidepressants (adj RR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.04-1.14) compared to those in urban practices. Patients on short practice lists were more likely to receive medication (adj RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.05-1.12) than those on long practice lists. Patients with short GP-patient relationship were more likely to receive talking therapy (adj RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.17-1.23) and medication (adj RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), and less likely to be sick-listed (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.87-0.89), than patients with long GP-patient relationship.

conclusionsProvision of GP depression care varied with practice characteristics. Talking therapy was less commonly provided in rural practices and among those with long-lasting GP-patient relationship. These differences may indicate some variation, and therefore, its reasons and clinical consequences need further investigation.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAdultCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesContinuity of patient careDepressionDrug therapyGeneral practiceHealth services researchLarge database researchPatient list sizeRural health servicesSick leave

Identifiers

PMID36163036
PMCPMC9511786
OpenAlexW4297154123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.