Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36162041›Full record

GuidelineJCO global oncology2022

Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update.

Surendra S Shastri, Sarah Temin, Maribel Almonte, Partha Basu, Nicole G Campos, Patty E Gravitt, Vandana Gupta, Dorothy C Lombe, Rául Murillo, Carolyn Nakisige and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Triage of HPV positivity in a high HIV prevalence setting: A prospective cohort study comparing visual triage methods and HPV genotype restriction in Botswana.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024
    Trial
  2. Choosing Wisely recommendations in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Surendra S ShastriThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sarah TeminAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-0551
Maribel AlmonteIARC, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1623-8323
Partha BasuIARC, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-4050
Nicole G CamposHarvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-4339
Patty E GravittNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Vandana GuptaV Care Foundation, Mumbai, India.
Dorothy C LombeRegional Cancer Treatment Services, MidCentral District Health Board, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-1801
Rául MurilloCentro Javeriano de Oncología, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7187-9946
Carolyn NakisigeMulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Gina OgilvieBC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Leeya F PinderUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Usha R PoliIndia Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-2274
Youlin QiaoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-0871
Yin Ling WooUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-1066
Jose JeronimoNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology · USAsociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología · COChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHarvard University · USInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · INMulago Hospital · UGPalmerston North Hospital · NZThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Malaya · MYUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo update resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.

methodsAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel to produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings. A review of existing guidelines, formal consensus-based process, and modified ADAPTE process to adapt existing guidelines was conducted. Other experts participated in formal consensus.

resultsThis guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five existing guidelines were identified and reviewed, and adapted recommendations form the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness analyses provided indirect evidence to inform consensus, which resulted in ≥ 75% agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is recommended in all resource settings; visual inspection with acetic acid may be used in basic settings. Recommended age ranges and frequencies vary by the following setting: maximal: age 25-65 years, every 5 years; enhanced: age 30-65 years, if two consecutive negative tests at 5-year intervals, then every 10 years; limited: age 30-49 years, every 10 years; basic: age 30-49 years, one to three times per lifetime. For basic settings, visual assessment is used to determine treatment eligibility; in other settings, genotyping with cytology or cytology alone is used to determine treatment. For basic settings, treatment is recommended if abnormal triage results are obtained; in other settings, abnormal triage results followed by colposcopy is recommended. For basic settings, treatment options are thermal ablation or loop electrosurgical excision procedure; for other settings, loop electrosurgical excision procedure or ablation is recommended; with a 12-month follow-up in all settings. Women who are HIV-positive should be screened with HPV testing after diagnosis, twice as many times per lifetime as the general population. Screening is recommended at 6 weeks postpartum in basic settings; in other settings, screening is recommended at 6 months. In basic settings without mass screening, infrastructure for HPV testing, diagnosis, and treatment should be developed.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/resource-stratified-guidelines.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedColposcopyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancySecondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID36162041
PMCPMC9812449
OpenAlexW4297262089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.