ArticleAperture neuro2022
A Multi-Dataset Evaluation of Frame Censoring for Motion Correction in Task-Based fMRI.
Article in Aperture neuro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time fMRI neurofeedback modulates auditory cortex activity and connectivity in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: A controlled study.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2025Trial
- Characterization of neural networks involved in transdiagnostic emotion dysregulation from a pilot randomized controlled trial of a neurostimulation-enhanced behavioral intervention.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2024Trial
- A multi-session simultaneous EEG-fMRI dataset with repeated experience sampling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Disarming emotional memories using targeted memory reactivation during rapid eye movement sleep.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Deficits in prefrontal metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 are associated with functional alterations during emotional processing in bipolar disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2024Article
- Orthogonal neural encoding of targets and distractors supports multivariate cognitive control.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- A Comparison of Denoising Approaches for Spoken Word Production Related Artefacts in Continuous Multiband fMRI Data.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A systematic review of neuroimaging approaches to mapping language in individuals.Journal of neurolinguistics · 2023Article
- Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Task-based functional MRI challenges in clinical neuroscience: Choice of the best head motion correction approach in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subject motion during fMRI can affect our ability to accurately measure signals of interest. In recent years, frame censoring-that is, statistically excluding motion-contaminated data within the general linear model using nuisance regressors-has appeared in several task-based fMRI studies as a mitigation strategy. However, there have been few systematic investigations quantifying its efficacy. In the present study, we compared the performance of frame censoring to several other common motion correction approaches for task-based fMRI using open data and reproducible workflows. We analyzed eight publicly available datasets representing 11 distinct tasks in child, adolescent, and adult participants. Performance was quantified using maximum
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.