Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161964›Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Human papillomavirus self-testing among unscreened and under-screened Māori, Pasifika and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: A preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial nonresponders.

Susan M Sherman, Naomi Brewer, Karen Bartholomew, Collette Bromhead, Sue Crengle, Chris Cunningham, Jeroen Douwes, Sunia Foliaki, Jane Grant, Anna Maxwell and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Susan M ShermanSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-3398
Naomi BrewerResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4159-3570
Karen BartholomewWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-2134
Collette BromheadSchool of Health Sciences, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-2191
Sue CrengleDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-1492
Chris CunninghamResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Jeroen DouwesResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-4036
Sunia FoliakiResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-5940
Jane GrantWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-400X
Anna MaxwellWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.
Georgina McPhersonWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-4746
Nina ScottWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-6400
Helen WihongiWaitematā District Health Board (DHB), Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-6955
John D PotterResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5439-1500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMāori, Pasifika and Asian women are less likely to attend cervical screening and Māori and Pasifika women are more likely to be diagnosed with later-stage cervical cancer than other women in Aotearoa New Zealand. This study-with under-screened women taking part in a randomized-controlled trial comparing self-testing and standard screening-explored the acceptability of a human papillomavirus (HPV) self-test kit and the preferred method for receiving it.

methodsMāori, Pasifika and Asian women (N= 376) completed a cross-sectional postal questionnaire. Twenty-six women who had not accepted the trial invitation were interviewed to understand their reasons for nonparticipation.

resultsMost women found the self-test kit easy and convenient to use and reported that they did not find it painful, uncomfortable or embarrassing. This was reflected in the preference for a self-test over a future smear test on the same grounds. Most women preferred to receive the kit by mail and take the test themselves, rather than having it done by a doctor or nurse. There was a range of preferences relating to how to return the kit. Phone calls with nonresponders revealed that, although most had received the test kit, the reasons for not choosing to be involved included not wanting to, being too busy or forgetting.

conclusionHPV self-testing was acceptable for Māori, Pasifika and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand. HPV self-testing has considerable potential to reduce the inequities in the current screening programme and should be made available with appropriate delivery options as soon as possible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study explored the acceptability of HPV self-testing and their preferences for engaging with it among Māori, Pasifika and Asian women. Thus, women from these underserved communities were the participants and focus of this study.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNew ZealandSelf CareSelf-TestingSurveys and QuestionnairesacceptabilityAsian womenHPVMāori womenPasifika womenself-sampleself-test

Identifiers

PMID36161964
PMCPMC9700139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.