Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161960›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Evolution of the ancestral mammalian karyotype and syntenic regions.

Joana Damas, Marco Corbo, Jaebum Kim, Jason Turner-Maier, Marta Farré, Denis M Larkin, Oliver A Ryder, Cynthia Steiner, Marlys L Houck, Shaune Hall and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Random, fragile, or correlated: Mechanisms of synteny decay in mammals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Joana DamasThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-2510
Marco CorboThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Jaebum KimDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, South Korea.
Jason Turner-MaierBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Marta FarréSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom.
Denis M LarkinThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.
Oliver A RyderConservation Genetics, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA 92027.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-763X
Cynthia SteinerConservation Science Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA 92027.
Marlys L HouckBeckman Center for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA 92027.
Shaune HallDovetail Genomics, LLC, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
Lily ShiueDovetail Genomics, LLC, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
Stephen ThomasDovetail Genomics, LLC, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
Thomas SwaleDovetail Genomics, LLC, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
Mark DalyDovetail Genomics, LLC, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
Jonas KorlachPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Marcela Uliano-SilvaWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Camila J MazzoniBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
Bruce W BirrenBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Diane P GenereuxBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-0989
Jeremy JohnsonBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-0253
Elinor K KarlssonBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-3776
Martin T NweeiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0001-7079-4123
Rebecca N JohnsonAustralian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-2827
Zoonomia Consortium
Harris A LewinThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-7287
University of Vienna · ATBroad Institute · USSmithsonian Institution · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of London · GB

Funding

The 200 mammals project: sequencing genomes by a novel cost-effective method, yielding a high resolution annotation of the human genome.R01HG008742 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BIRREN, BRUCE W., KARLSSON, ELINOR · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Acquisition of Covaris E220 and Sciclone G3 systems for high throughput sequencinS10OD010786 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COMAI, LUCA · 2012 to 2012
$311k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008742NIH HHS S10 OD010786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decrypting the rearrangements that drive mammalian chromosome evolution is critical to understanding the molecular bases of speciation, adaptation, and disease susceptibility. Using 8 scaffolded and 26 chromosome-scale genome assemblies representing 23/26 mammal orders, we computationally reconstructed ancestral karyotypes and syntenic relationships at 16 nodes along the mammalian phylogeny. Three different reference genomes (human, sloth, and cattle) representing phylogenetically distinct mammalian superorders were used to assess reference bias in the reconstructed ancestral karyotypes and to expand the number of clades with reconstructed genomes. The mammalian ancestor likely had 19 pairs of autosomes, with nine of the smallest chromosomes shared with the common ancestor of all amniotes (three still conserved in extant mammals), demonstrating a striking conservation of synteny for ∼320 My of vertebrate evolution. The numbers and types of chromosome rearrangements were classified for transitions between the ancestral mammalian karyotype, descendent ancestors, and extant species. For example, 94 inversions, 16 fissions, and 14 fusions that occurred over 53 My differentiated the therian from the descendent eutherian ancestor. The highest breakpoint rate was observed between the mammalian and therian ancestors (3.9 breakpoints/My). Reconstructed mammalian ancestor chromosomes were found to have distinct evolutionary histories reflected in their rates and types of rearrangements. The distributions of genes, repetitive elements, topologically associating domains, and actively transcribed regions in multispecies homologous synteny blocks and evolutionary breakpoint regions indicate that purifying selection acted over millions of years of vertebrate evolution to maintain syntenic relationships of developmentally important genes and regulatory landscapes of gene-dense chromosomes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularKaryotypeMammalsSyntenyAnimalsCattleChromosomes, MammalianEutheriaHumansPhylogenySlothsancestral genome reconstructionchromosome evolutionmammalssynteny conservationtopologically associating domains

Identifiers

PMID36161960
PMCPMC9550189
OpenAlexW4297093866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.