Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161722›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2022

Factor analysis of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in American Indian women.

Jada L Brooks, Leslie B Adams, Cheryl L Woods-Giscombé, Emily G Currin, Giselle M Corbie-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jada L BrooksSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-3566
Leslie B AdamsDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cheryl L Woods-GiscombéSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Emily G CurrinSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Giselle M Corbie-SmithDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
Mentoring in community influences on CVD riskK24HL105493 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CORBIE, GISELLE · 2010 to 2019
$1.5M
Inflammatory Markers, Hazardous Air Pollutants, and Psychosocial FactorsK23ES027026 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BROOKS, JADA L · 2016 to 2020
$741k
EPA 83578501NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105493NIEHS NIH HHS K23 ES027026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is widely used to assess depressive symptoms in the general population. It lacks validation for widespread use within the American Indian population, however. To address this gap, we explored and confirmed the factor structure of the CES-D among a community sample of southeastern American Indian women. We analyzed data from a sample of 150 American Indian women ages 18-50 from a southeastern tribe who had complete responses on the CES-D as part of a larger cross-sectional, community-engaged study. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the measure's validity. We examined EFA models ranging from one to five factors, with the four-factor structure yielding the best overall model fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03). Differences between the four-factor EFA-retained structure from our sample and Radloff's four-factor structure emerged. Only the interpersonal factor was common to both factor structures. Our study findings confirm the validity of the original four-factor structure of the CES-D for younger adult American Indian women in the southeast. Contrasting findings with the EFA-retained structure, however, provide a more nuanced interpretation of our results.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeDepressionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAmerican Indiandepressionfactor analysisvaliditywomen

Identifiers

PMID36161722
PMCPMC9922528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.