ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2022
Additional gastric resection after one anastomosis gastric bypass-are there benefits?
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary and Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and GRADE-Based IFSO Position Statement.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is a bariatric surgery procedure that has proved effective for weight loss and the resolution of metabolic disorders. The present study evaluates the effect on postoperative outcomes of resecting the corpus and fundus as an addition to OAGB.
methodsThis retrospective study recorded and evaluated the data of 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic OAGB due to morbid obesity (Body Mass Index-BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 ) in our clinic between January 2018 and January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group comprised patients undergoing standard OAGB (n = 49), while the second group included those undergoing OAGB plus (OAGB with additional corpus and fundus resection) (n = 34). The patient data recorded for comparison included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative weight (at 6 and 12 months), body mass index (BMI), excess weight loss% (EWL%), excess BMI loss% (EBL%), and total body weight loss% (TBWL%), hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose (FBG), albumin and HbA1c levels.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, gender or comorbidities. The operating time, the number of cartridges used during the operation and the length of hospital stay were statistically higher in the OAGB plus group (p = 0.039, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups regarding weight, BMI, EBL% and TBWL% preoperatively and at 6- and 12-months postsurgery. There was also no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative (at months 6 and 12) levels of hemoglobin, FBG, albumin, and HbA1c between the two groups. DISCUSSION: The addition of resection of the gastric fundus and corpus to an OAGB has no impact on postoperative weight loss or metabolic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.