ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2022
Predictors of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Outcomes associated with bilateral plastic versus metal stents for palliation in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: an updated meta-analysis from the United States.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for post-ERCP cholangitis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a retrospective multicenter study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Different Guidewire-Assisted Techniques for Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Uncovered Metallic Stent Placement.Journal of digestive diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-ERCP cholangitis (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and associated sepsis can be lifethreatening. Despite the wealth of studies on post-ERCP pancreatitis risk factors, there is limited data on post-ERCP cholangitis. This study aimed to investigate the rates, predictors, and outcomes of post-ERCP cholangitis.
methodsA retrospective review of 452 ERCP cases performed by a single endoscopist at a tertiary center between March 2019 and February 2021 was performed. Patient-related, organizational and periprocedural factors that could affect post-ERCP cholangitis were evaluated. Predictors of post-ERCP cholangitis were determined by multivariable analysis.
resultsThe post-ERCP cholangitis rate was 19.5%. Cholangiocarcinoma (OR 15.72, CI 2.43-101.55, p = 0.004), the American Society of Anesthesiologist Score (ASA) (OR 2.87, CI 1.14-7.21, p = 0.024), an increase in bilirubin after ERCP (OR 1.81 CI 1.01-3.22, p = 0.043), body mass index (OR 1.15, CI 1.00-1.33, p = 0.04) and procedure duration (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049) were predictors of post-ERCP cholangitis. Biliary stone extraction using a balloon was found to be protective against cholangitis (OR 0.18, CI 0.05-0.60, p = 0.005). Sepsis rate related to post-ERCP cholangitis was 2.4% and death 1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.