Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161425›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2022

Psychotropic Drugs and Adverse Kidney Effects: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade of Research.

Joseph Junior Damba, Katie Bodenstein, Paola Lavin, Jessica Drury, Harmehr Sekhon, Christel Renoux, Emilie Trinh, Soham Rej, Kyle T Greenway

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Probiotic fermentation of soybeans and use of fermented soy in cookies.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence of Severe Mental Illness and Its Associations With Health Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Swedish Nationwide Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lithium and Kidney Disease.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2025
    Article
  14. Lithium: current state of the art and future directions.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2024
    Review
  15. Edema related to treatment with psychotropic drugs.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph Junior Damba *Geri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Katie Bodenstein *Geri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Paola Lavin *Geri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jessica DruryGeri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Harmehr SekhonGeri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christel RenouxDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Emilie TrinhDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Soham RejGeri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kyle T GreenwayGeri-PARTy Research Group, Lady Davis Research Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Kyle.greenway@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-493X
Jewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR PJ8-169696CIHR PJT-175191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePsychotropic drugs are a heterogenous group of treatments prescribed for many psychiatric disorders, often for long periods. Their effects on the kidney and its functioning are complex and a source of significant research and debate. This article aims to review recent evidence of the acute and chronic kidney adverse events of diverse psychotropes.

methodsA systematic search of randomized controlled trials and large observational studies (n ≥ 100) reporting the effects of psychotropic drugs on the kidney was conducted. The MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and EMBASE databases from 2011 to 2021, inclusive, were broadly searched with few restrictions and no prespecified outcomes. Two or more independent reviewers assessed and summarized all eligible studies, including risks of bias and levels of evidence.

resultsIn all, 1999 abstracts were screened for eligibility and 47 articles were included, which examined lithium (33), antiepileptics (10), antipsychotics (13), and antidepressants (9). No studies examining kidney adverse effects of other psychotropes, such as benzodiazepines, met inclusion criteria. Study populations were adult (8), geriatric (9), and mixed (30). Lithium was almost unanimously associated with (1) chronic kidney disease and (2) nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in methodologically diverse studies. The most supported risk factors for declining kidney functioning with lithium were advanced age, duration of lithium treatment, acute lithium toxicity, female sex, medications with known renal interactions, diabetes mellitus/hyperglycemia, and overall medical comorbidity. Supratherapeutic lithium concentrations are both the causes and consequences of acute kidney injury. Once significant chronic kidney disease has developed, four studies found that replacing lithium with other mood stabilizers does not slow progression, and the evolution to end-stage kidney disease is rare overall with modern practices. Compared to lithium, fewer studies examined antipsychotics and antiepileptics but found relatively less direct kidney harms. Antidepressants were not associated with acute or chronic kidney harms.

conclusionsDespite the heterogeneity of findings, owing to varying methodologies and research challenges, recent studies strongly suggest that lithium is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, especially in older adults and long-term lithium users. Clinicians should balance the harms of lithium against its established benefits, and ensure adequate monitoring and management of comorbidities in all patients. Weaker evidence suggests that antiepileptics such as valproate and antipsychotics result in comparatively less harm to the kidney than lithium, but warrant monitoring because of multiple direct and indirect mechanisms for potential kidney adverse events. Antidepressants do not have clear kidney adverse effects and appear safe (though potentially less effective) in the setting of kidney disease. Other classes of psychotropic drugs have received little research interest. Further research is warranted, particularly into specific antiepileptics and antipsychotics, and careful attention should be paid to mitigating important sources of bias such as confounding by indication.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDiabetes Insipidus, NephrogenicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansKidneyLithiumLithium CompoundsPsychotropic DrugsValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesLithiumLithium CompoundsPsychotropic DrugsValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36161425
OpenAlexW4297238194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.