Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2022

Expected cost effectiveness of the fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine against the omicron variant of COVID-19: a preliminary report.

Rujittika Mungmunpuntipantip, Viroj Wiwanitkit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rujittika MungmunpuntipantipPrivate Academic Consultant Bangkok, Thailand.
Viroj WiwanitkitDr. DY Patil University Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCOVID-19 immunization has been shown to be effective in the prevention of COVID-19. Traditionally, two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are required. Booster immunization is generally required when immunity has deteriorated.

methodsThe effectiveness of the alternate boost immunization protocol is still unknown. The authors of this study used a cost-effectiveness analysis, which is a retrospective analysis on datasets on cost and effectiveness, to examine the projected cost-effectiveness of boosting COVID-19 vaccination by a fourth dose.

resultsThe cost-effectiveness of the fourth-dose COVID booster vaccine was found to be higher in this study.

conclusionIt could imply that vaccinating against the current pandemic of the novel form, omicron, with the additional COVID-19 vaccine is a smarter idea.

Indexed as

boosterCOVID-19dosehalfvaccinevariant

Identifiers

PMID36161259
PMCPMC9490214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.