Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36161047›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2022

Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

Shiva Rangwani, Devarshi R Ardeshna, Khalid Mumtaz, Sean G Kelly, Samuel Y Han, Somashekar G Krishna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: Are we ready for routine use?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pediatric endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: 3-year experience.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: current status and prospects].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. EUS-guided liver biopsy: the optimal technique?Endoscopy international open · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiva RangwaniDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Devarshi R ArdeshnaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Khalid MumtazDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Sean G KellyDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Samuel Y HanDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Somashekar G KrishnaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. somashekar.krishna@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEndosonographyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyEndoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsyLiver biopsyLiver parenchymal diseasePercutaneous liver biopsyPortal pressure gradientTransjugular liver biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36161047
PMCPMC9372801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.