Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160936›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2022

Data science in the intensive care unit.

Ming-Hao Luo, Dan-Lei Huang, Jing-Chao Luo, Ying Su, Jia-Kun Li, Guo-Wei Tu, Zhe Luo

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The artificial intelligence evidence-based medicine pyramid.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ming-Hao LuoShanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Dan-Lei HuangShanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jing-Chao LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ying SuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jia-Kun LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Guo-Wei TuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhe LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. luo.zhe@zs-hospital.sh.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this editorial, we comment on the current development and deployment of data science in intensive care units (ICUs). Data in ICUs can be classified into qualitative and quantitative data with different technologies needed to translate and interpret them. Data science, in the form of artificial intelligence (AI), should find the right interaction between physicians, data and algorithm. For individual patients and physicians, sepsis and mechanical ventilation have been two important aspects where AI has been extensively studied. However, major risks of bias, lack of generalizability and poor clinical values remain. AI deployment in the ICUs should be emphasized more to facilitate AI development. For ICU management, AI has a huge potential in transforming resource allocation. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has given opportunities to establish such systems which should be investigated further. Ethical concerns must be addressed when designing such AI.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCOVID-19Data scienceIntensive care unitsInteraction

Identifiers

PMID36160936
PMCPMC9483002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.