ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
A retrospective study on the relationship between fibrosis‑4 index and all‑cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Subclinical Liver Fibrosis With Death in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- FIB-4, a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis, predicts mortality and adverse events after acute myocardial ınfarction.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- FIB-4 predicts coronary disease and early outcomes in unstable angina pectoris.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Non-invasive scoring systems of liver fibrosis predict prognosis in the cohort with myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between the fibrosis-4 and the risk of left ventricular aneurysm formation in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Integration of two-dimensional echocardiography: A novel risk indicator for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Impact of left atrial diameter on all-cause mortality of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Association between FIB-4, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular disease risk among diabetic individuals: NHANES 1999-2008.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is a non-invasive score used to determine liver fibrosis. The present study aimed to assess the predictive ability of FIB-4 for all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It retrospectively analyzed a total of 797 patients who were diagnosed with AMI. The patients were equally divided into three tertiles based on the values of the FIB-4 index scores: Group A (FIB-4 index <3.19; n=265), group B (3.19 ≤FIB-4 <8.14; n=267) and group C (FIB-4 index ≥8.14 group; n=265). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the incidence of all-cause mortality among the three groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association of risk of all-cause mortality in the patients. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the incidence of all-cause mortality was statistically significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated the risk of all-cause mortality in group C was significantly higher than in group A (hazard ratio: 2.898, 95% confidence interval: 1.069-7.857, P=0.037). In receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, an FIB-4 index of 6.647 and a Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score of 26.75 had sensitivities of 67.3 and 55.8% and specificities of 63 and 71.9%, respectively. Comparing the area under the ROC curve revealed no statistical differences between the FIB-4 index and SYNTAX score (0.654 vs. 0.661; P=0.864). Higher FIB-4 index were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality among AMI patients. The FIB-4 index, a noninvasive and convenient tool, plays a potential role in the prognosis of AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.