Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160826›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2022

Surgical Management of Postoperative Grade C Pancreatic Fistula following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Orlando Jorge Martins Torres, José Maria Assunção Moraes-Junior, Eduardo de Souza Martins Fernandes, Thilo Hackert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Orlando Jorge Martins TorresDepartment of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Presidente Dutra University Hospital - Maranhão Federal University, São Luiz, Brazil.
José Maria Assunção Moraes-JuniorDepartment of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Presidente Dutra University Hospital - Maranhão Federal University, São Luiz, Brazil.
Eduardo de Souza Martins FernandesDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University and São Lucas Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula ranges from 2 to 11% depending on the type of pancreatic resection. This complication may frequently require early relaparotomy and the surgical approach remains technically challenging and is still associated with a high mortality. Infectious complications and post-operative hemorrhage are the two most common causes of reoperation. Summary: The best management of grade C pancreatic fistulas remains controversial and ranges from conservative approaches up to completion pancreatectomy. The choice of the technique depends on the patient's conditions, intraoperative findings, and surgeon's discretion. A pancreas-preserving strategy appears to be attractive, including from simple to more complex procedures such as debridement and drainage, and external wirsungostomy. Completion pancreatectomy should be reserved for selected cases, including stable patients with severe infection complication or hemorrhage after pancreatic fistula who do not respond to pancreas-preserving procedures. Key Messages: This review describes the current options for management of grade C pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy with regard to indication, choice of procedure and outcomes of the different approaches.

Indexed as

Grade C fistulaPancreatic fistulaPancreatoduodenectomyPostoperative pancreatic fistulaSurgical managementWhipple

Identifiers

PMID36160826
PMCPMC9421704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.