Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160813›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2022

Effects of medically generated electromagnetic interference from medical devices on cardiac implantable electronic devices: A review.

Walker Barmore, Himax Patel, Cassandra Voong, Caroline Tarallo, Joe B Calkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Walker BarmoreDepartment of Cardiology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States. wabarmore@augusta.edu.
Himax PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
Cassandra VoongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
Caroline TaralloMedical College of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
Joe B CalkinsDepartment of Cardiology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) become more prevalent, it is important to acknowledge potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) from other sources, such as internal and external electronic devices and procedures and its effect on these devices. EMI from other sources can potentially inhibit pacing and trigger shocks in permanent pacemakers (PPM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), respectively. This review analyzes potential EMI amongst CIED and left ventricular assist device, deep brain stimulators, spinal cord stimulators, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, and throughout an array of procedures, such as endoscopy, bronchoscopy, and procedures involving electrocautery. Although there is evidence to support EMI from internal and external devices and during procedures, there is a lack of large multicenter studies, and, as a result, current management guidelines are based primarily on expert opinion and anecdotal experience. We aim to provide a general overview of PPM/ICD function, review documented EMI effect on these devices, and acknowledge current management of CIED interference.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyCapsule endoscopyCardiac implantable electronic devicesElectrocauteryElectromagnetic interferenceEndoscopyImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorLeft ventricular assist devicePacemakerPermanent pacemakersSpinal cord stimulatorTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulators unit

Identifiers

PMID36160813
PMCPMC9453256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.