Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Influence of body mobility on attention networks in school-aged prematurely born children: A controlled trial.

Joëlle Rosenbaum, Hadrien Ceyte, Isabelle Hamon, Hélène Deforge, Alexandre M J Hascoët, Sébastien Caudron, Jean-Michel Hascoët

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03125447 (Posture and Mobility Influence on Attention Capacity in Former Premature Children at 6 Years of Age.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03125447 nacompletednot on this map

Posture and Mobility Influence on Attention Capacity in Former Premature Children at 6 Years of Age.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2017 to 2020Enrolled51ConditionsAttention Concentration Difficulty, Mobility LimitationArmsspeed and accuracy answer to visual stimuli
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joëlle RosenbaumDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Hadrien CeyteDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Isabelle HamonDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Hélène DeforgeDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Alexandre M J HascoëtDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Sébastien CaudronCNRS, LPNC, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Michel HascoëtDéveloppement, Adaptation et Handicap Laboratory (DevAH), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School-aged prematurely born children (PC) have a higher risk of academic difficulties, which may be partly explained by attention difficulties. It has been suggested that children's attentional performance might be influenced by their body posture and spontaneous body motion. The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03125447) was to test the influence of three body mobility conditions on the three functions of attention (alertness, orienting, and executive control) among school-aged PC vs. term-born children (TC). Notably, 21 PC and 21 TC performed the Attention Network Test for Children in three body mobility conditions, namely, sitting and standing imposed fixed postures and a free-to-move condition. The children's median reaction times were compared between trials (1) with and without alerting cues, (2) with valid and invalid orienting cues, and (3) with and without distracting information, to calculate the performance of alertness, orienting, and executive control, respectively. Results showed that with distracting information, PC exhibited significantly slower responses in the standing-still posture than in the sitting-still posture (1,077 ± 240 vs. 1,175 ± 273 ms,

Indexed as

alertnessbody mobilityexecutive controlorientingpostureprematurity

Identifiers

PMID36160773
PMCPMC9492848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.