ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Evaluating behavior change factors over time for a simple vs. complex health behavior.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthy behavior of pregnant women: review and integrated model conceptualization.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Web-Based Nutrition and Physical Activity Education Intervention to Ameliorate Cardiometabolic Risks: A Single-Arm and Non-Randomized Feasibility Study.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Compliance with Physician Follow-up Appointments After Acute Traumatic Hand and Forearm Injuries: A Prospective Comparison of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Clinical Characteristics.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting individual differences in digital alcohol intervention effectiveness through multimodal data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta analysis of standalone digital behavior change interventions on physical activity.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A full-factorial test of motivational and volitional intervention strategies for promoting exercise habit formation and exercise maintenance among new users of an online exercise class platform.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Article
- An investigation of the relationship between grit, physical activity, and self-efficacy: a variable-centered and person-centered approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A Behavioral Perspective for Improving Exercise Adherence.Sports medicine - open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Researchers are working to identify dynamic factors involved in the shift from behavioral initiation to maintenance-factors which may depend on behavioral complexity. We test hypotheses regarding changes in factors involved in behavioral initiation and maintenance and their relationships to behavioral frequency over time, for a simple (taking a supplement) vs. complex (exercise) behavior. Methods: Data are secondary analyses from a larger RCT, in which young adult women, new to both behaviors, were randomly assigned to take daily calcium ( Finding: Results were partly in-line with expectations, in that individuals' intentions and self-efficacy predicted initial behavioral engagement for both behaviors, and habit strength increased for both behaviors, becoming a significant predictor of behavioral frequency in later weeks of the study in some analyses. However, results depended on whether the outcome was self-reported or objectively measured and whether analyses were bivariate or multivariate (regression). Discussion: The factors theorized to play a role in behavioral maintenance (intrinsic motivation, self-identity, and habit strength) started to develop, but only habit strength predicted behavioral frequency by study-end, for both behaviors. Differences in initiation and maintenance between behaviors of differing complexity may not be as stark as theorized, but longer follow-up times are required to evaluate maintenance factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.