ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2022
A Mini-Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nano-Tools for Pancreatitis.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotherapy for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of experimental strategies and mechanisms of action.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Pancreatitis in Women of Reproductive Age: Global Burden, Rising Incidence in Youth, and Forecasts to 2050.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Nano-Reagents in Acute Pancreatitis: Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Theranostic Advances.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Demystifying anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies against pancreatitis and concomitant diseases: a 2025 perspective.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Pharmacological Potential of Cinnamic Acid and Derivatives: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From micro to macro, nanotechnology demystifies acute pancreatitis: a new generation of treatment options emerges.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Influence of standardized nursing intervention combined with mindfulness stress reduction training on the curative effect in patients with acute pancreatitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Research Progress of Neutrophil-Mediated Drug Delivery Strategies for Inflammation-Related Disease.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Targeting and functional effects of biomaterials-based nanoagents for acute pancreatitis treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatitis is an inflammatory reaction of pancreatic tissue digestion, edema, bleeding and even necrosis caused by activation of pancreatin due to various causes. In particular, patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) often suffer from secondary infection, peritonitis and shock, and have a high mortality rate. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) can cause permanent damage to the pancreas. Due to the innate characteristics, structure and location of the pancreas, there is no effective treatment, only relief of symptoms. Especially, AP is an unpredictable and potentially fatal disease, and the timely diagnosis and treatment remains a major challenge. With the rapid development of nanomedicine technology, many potential tools can be used to address this problem. In this review, we have introduced the pathophysiological processes of pancreatitis to understanding its etiology and severity. Most importantly, the current progress in the diagnosis and treatment tools of pancreatitis based on nanomedicine is summarized and prospected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.