Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160292›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

A Multicentre Analysis of Approaches to Learning and Student Experiences of Learning Anatomy Online.

Danya Stone, Georga J Longhurst, Kate Dulohery, Thomas Campbell, Annalise Richards, Dominic O'Brien, Thomas Franchi, Samuel Hall, Scott Border

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danya Stone *Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PX UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-0217
Georga J Longhurst *Department of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, SW17 0RE UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7408-6829
Kate DuloherySchool of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, SR1 3SD UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-1366
Thomas CampbellSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8 Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-6081
Annalise RichardsSchool of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU UK.
Dominic O'BrienDepartment of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PX UK.
Thomas FranchiSchool of Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-8098
Samuel HallCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-6636
Scott BorderDepartment of Anatomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The approaches to learning students adopt when learning anatomy online could yield important lessons for educators. Dissection room teaching can encourage students to adopt a deep approach to learning anatomy. It was therefore hypothesized that the proportion of students adopting a deep approach to learning would be lower in a population learning anatomy online. This research aims to investigate the experiences of students learning anatomy online during the COVID-19 pandemic and the approaches to learning they adopted. Methods: A survey was distributed to medical students at 7 universities across the UK and Ireland. The survey included two previously validated questionnaires: Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students and Anatomy Learning Experience Questionnaire. Results: The analysis included 224 unique student responses. Students' approach to learning mirrored reports from previous studies conducted during face-to-face tuition with 44.3% adopting deep, 40.7% strategic, 11.4% surface, and 3.6% combined learning approaches. The university ( Conclusion: It is important to highlight that students value in-person opportunities to learn from human cadaveric material and hence dissection room sessions should remain at the forefront of anatomical education. It is recommended that future online and/or blended provisions of anatomy teaching include varied resources that maximize engagement with media featuring cadaveric specimens. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01633-7.

Indexed as

Anatomy educationApproach to learningBlended learningCOVID-19Distance learningRemote learning

Identifiers

PMID36160292
PMCPMC9483883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.