Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160179›Full record

ArticleCase reports in endocrinology2022

Was It an Adrenocortical Adenoma or an Adrenocortical Carcinoma? Limitation of the Weiss Scoring System in Determining the Malignant Potential of Adrenocortical Tumor: Report on Two Cases.

Cheuk-Lik Wong, Chun-Kit Fok, Yuk-Kit Chan, Vicki Ho-Kee Tam, Lai-Ming Fung

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheuk-Lik WongDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Caritas Medical Centre, Shamshuipo, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-5815
Chun-Kit FokDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Caritas Medical Centre, Shamshuipo, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Yuk-Kit ChanDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, The New Territories, Hong Kong.
Vicki Ho-Kee TamDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Caritas Medical Centre, Shamshuipo, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Lai-Ming FungDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Caritas Medical Centre, Shamshuipo, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-1801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy. An accurate diagnosis of ACC is of paramount importance as it greatly impacts the management and prognosis of a patient. However, the differentiation between early stage, low-grade ACC and adrenocortical adenoma (ACA) may not always be straightforward. The recommended classification system, namely, the Weiss scoring system, is not without flaws. We herein report two cases of ACC which were initially diagnosed as ACA according to the Weiss scoring system but developed distant metastases in subsequent years. Conclusions: Although the Weiss scoring system is recommended as the reference pathological classification system to diagnose adrenocortical carcinoma, there remain tumors of borderline malignant potential which may escape accurate classification. Various alternative classification systems and algorithms exist but none are proven to be perfect. Clinicians should recognize the potential limitation of these histological criteria and scoring systems and incorporate other clinical parameters, such as the pattern of hormonal secretion, urinary steroid profiling, and radiographic features, to improve the prognostication and surveillance strategy of these tumors.

Identifiers

PMID36160179
PMCPMC9492358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.