Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160089›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research

Cataract Grading in Pure Senile Cataracts: Pentacam versus LOCS III.

Mohammad Mirzaie, Erfan Bahremani, Nazli Taheri, Zhila Khamnian, Banafshe Kharrazi Ghadim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad MirzaieNikoukari Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-8566
Erfan BahremaniNikoukari Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-8667
Nazli TaheriNikoukari Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Zhila KhamnianDepartment of Community Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Banafshe Kharrazi GhadimNikoukari Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Pentacam Cataract Grading Scale (PCGS) versus the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS III) in scaling pure age-related cataract. Methods: Between April 2016 and May 2017, eyes of 281 patients were evaluated for grading of lens opacity. We used LOCS III and PCGS. Patients with pure age-related cataract with no previous history of eye surgery, eye trauma, or chronic systemic disease between 50 and 95 years of age were included. The examination of the patients was done, using slit lamp and LOCS III grading chart. The second examination was done a week later, using Oculus Pentacam. Next, we graded them using a PNS grading score. Spearman's rank correlation and a Bland-Altman Plot were implemented for analysis using MedCalc 14. 8.1. Results: Three hundred eyes were examined. Of them, 189 patients were male, and patients between 70 to 80 years old were the most common group. The correlation between grades of two methods was 0.47 ( Conclusion: The association between LOCSIII and PCGS is not so favorable, however, it is an economical and effective method to assess lens opacities is LOCSIII. PCGS can be used in early diagnosis. For a definitive diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic intervention, an ophthalmological examination is needed.

Indexed as

CataractLens Nucleus DensitometryLens Opacities Classification System IIIPentacamScheimpflug Lens Density

Identifiers

PMID36160089
PMCPMC9493415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.