ArticleCell reports methods2022
Improving MHC class I antigen-processing predictions using representation learning and cleavage site-specific kernels.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A common network of residue-residue contacts underlies interactions between peptides and HLA class II complex.PloS one · 2026Article
- Mutational pressure promotes release of public CD8iScience · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we propose a new deep-learning model, MHCrank, to predict the probability that a peptide will be processed for presentation by MHC class I molecules. We find that the performance of our model is significantly higher than that of two previously published baseline methods: MHCflurry and netMHCpan. This improvement arises from utilizing both cleavage site-specific kernels and learned embeddings for amino acids. By visualizing site-specific amino acid enrichment patterns, we observe that MHCrank's top-ranked peptides exhibit enrichments at biologically relevant positions and are consistent with previous work. Furthermore, the cosine similarity matrix derived from MHCrank's learned embeddings for amino acids correlates highly with physiochemical properties that have been experimentally demonstrated to be instrumental in determining a peptide's favorability for processing. Altogether, the results reported in this work indicate that MHCrank demonstrates strong performance compared with existing methods and could have vast applicability in aiding drug and vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.