Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160025›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2022

Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study.

Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa, Terutaka Hiramatsu, Masaharu Sugimoto, Mikiko Uemura, Yuki Mori, Ryoko Ichibori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yoshiyuki YoshikawaDepartment of Health Science, Naragakuen University, Nara City, Japan.
Terutaka HiramatsuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Housenka Hospital, Ibaraki City, Japan.
Masaharu SugimotoDepartment of Physical therapy, Kobe Gakuin University (Retired), Kobe, Japan.
Mikiko UemuraDepartment of Health Science, Kansai University of Welfare Sciences, Kashiwara City, Japan.
Yuki MoriDepartment of Rehabilitation, Housenka Hospital, Ibaraki City, Japan.
Ryoko IchiboriDepartment of Dermatology, Housenka Hospital, Ibaraki City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This double-blind crossover-controlled trial aimed to verify the effect of electrical stimulation therapy on pressure injuries with undermining. Methods: : In this trial, we compared the healing rates between a sham period and a treatment period using monophasic pulsed microcurrent therapy. The participants were randomly assigned to the sham or treatment group and received stimulation for 2 weeks. All the participants, physical therapists, and researchers were blinded to the allocation. For the main analysis, data on the effect of the intervention on changes in weekly healing and contraction rates of the wound areas, including undermining, were analyzed based on a two-period crossover study design. The intervention effect was estimated by examining the mean treatment difference for each period using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Results: : The reduction of the entire wound area, including the undermining area, resulted in significantly higher healing and contraction rates in the treatment group (overall wound area reduction rate: contraction rate, P=0.008; period healing rate, P=0.002). Conclusions: : Electrical stimulation therapy for pressure injuries, using conditions based on the findings of an in vivo culture study, was effective in reducing the wound area.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationpressure ulcerwound carewound healing

Identifiers

PMID36160025
PMCPMC9470497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.