ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Ascertaining yield and grain protein content stability in wheat genotypes having the
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- MGIDI-based ideotype selection and genetic variation for wheat agronomic traits and bread-making quality (BMQ) under drought stress condition.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Assessing the stability and adaptability of wheat genotypes in well-watered and rainfed conditions using AMMI, BLUP, GGE biplot and MTSI approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dissecting the Opposing Roles of Thermal Intensity and Growing Degree Days in Regulating Spring Wheat Protein Content.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multiple AMMI models investigation to decipher the genotype by environment (G×E) interaction in sugarcane interspecific hybrids for yield and quality traits.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of iron-solubilizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Dissecting Genotype by Environment Interactions in Moroccan Wheat: An Advanced Biplot and Heatmap Analysis Unveiling Agronomic, Quality Traits, and Genotypic Stability for Tailored Breeding Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring the genotype-environment interaction of bread wheat in ambient and high-temperature planting conditions: a rigorous investigation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Nitrogen uptake dynamics of high and low protein wheat genotypes.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Exploring Genetics by Environment Interactions in Some Rice Genotypes across Varied Environmental Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Wheat Grains as a Sustainable Source of Protein for Health.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Application of potassium nitrate and salicylic acid improves grain yield and related traits by delaying leaf senescence inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high performance and stability of wheat genotypes for yield, grain protein content (GPC), and other desirable traits are critical for varietal development and food and nutritional security. Likewise, the genotype by environment (G × E) interaction (GEI) should be thoroughly investigated and favorably utilized whenever genotype selection decisions are made. The present study was planned with the following two major objectives: 1) determination of GEI for some advanced wheat genotypes across four locations (Ludhiana, Ballowal, Patiala, and Bathinda) of Punjab, India; and 2) selection of the best genotypes with high GPC and yield in various environments. Different univariate [Eberhart and Ruessll's models; Perkins and Jinks' models; Wrike's Ecovalence; and Francis and Kannenberg's models], multivariate (AMMI and GGE biplot), and correlation analyses were used to interpret the data from the multi-environmental trial (MET). Consequently, both the univariate and multivariate analyses provided almost similar results regarding the top-performing and stable genotypes. The analysis of variance revealed that variation due to environment, genotype, and GEI was highly significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels of significance for all studied traits. The days to flowering, plant height, spikelets per spike, grain per spike, days to maturity, and 1000-grain weight were specifically affected by the environment, whereas yield was mainly affected by the environment and GEI. Genotypes, on the other hand, had a greater impact on the GPC than environmental conditions. As a result, a multi-environmental investigation was necessary to identify the GEI for wheat genotype selection because the GEI was very significant for all of the evaluated traits. Yield, 1000-grain weight, spikelet per spike, and days to maturity were observed to have positive correlations, implying the feasibility of their simultaneous selection for yield enhancement. However, GPC was observed to have a negative correlation with yield. Patiala was found to be the most discriminating environment for both yield and GPC and also the most effective representative environment for GPC, whereas Ludhiana was found to be the most effective representative environment for yield. Eventually, two NILs (BWL7508, and BWL7511) were selected as the top across all environments for both yield and GPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.