Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

The new general biological property of stem-like tumor cells Part I. Peculiarities of the process of the double-stranded DNA fragments internalization into stem-like tumor cells.

Genrikh S Ritter, Evgeniya V Dolgova, Daria D Petrova, Yaroslav R Efremov, Anastasia S Proskurina, Ekaterina A Potter, Vera S Ruzanova, Svetlana S Kirikovich, Evgeniy V Levites, Oleg S Taranov and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stimulation of mouse hematopoietic stem cells by angiogenin and DNA preparations.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Article
  3. Developmental Biology: Computational and Experimental Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Genrikh S RitterInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Evgeniya V DolgovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Daria D PetrovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Yaroslav R EfremovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anastasia S ProskurinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ekaterina A PotterInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vera S RuzanovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Svetlana S KirikovichInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Evgeniy V LevitesInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Oleg S TaranovState Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "Vector", Koltsovo, Russia.
Alexandr A OstaninResearch Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Elena R ChernykhResearch Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nikolay A KolchanovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Sergey S BogachevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem-like tumor cells of ascites carcinoma Krebs-2 and Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-lymphoma were shown to possess the innate capability of binding and internalizing the TAMRA-labeled double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) probe. The process of binding and internalizing is rather complicated and composed of the following successive stages: 1) initiating electrostatic interaction and contact of a negatively charged dsDNA molecule with a positively charged molecule(s) on the surface of a stem-like tumor cell; 2) binding of the dsDNA probe to a tumor stem cell surface protein(s)

Indexed as

carcinoma Krebs-2clathrin/caveolar mechanism internalizationEpstein-Barr virus–induced B-lymphomaheparin/dextran sulfate/polyanion-binding sitesinternalization of double-stranded DNA

Identifiers

PMID36159968
PMCPMC9492886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.