Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159904›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine treatment on sensorineural hearing loss: a meta-analysis.

Xue Bai, Miao Wang, Xun Niu, Hong Yu, Jian-Xin Yue, Yu Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Fungal-Derived Bioactive Resource for Cochlear Protection:Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine treatment on sensorineural hearing loss: a meta-analysis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xue BaiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.
Miao WangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.
Xun NiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.
Hong YuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.
Jian-Xin YueDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.
Yu SunDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) is an efficacious treatment for sensorineural hearing loss in animal models, such as noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), however previous research into the effect of NAC on patients with hearing loss produced contradictory results. In this study, we investigated the effect of NAC treatment on sensorineural hearing loss. PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched in their entirety using the key words: hearing loss, NAC, N-acetylcysteine, and sensorineural hearing loss. Studies which included assessment of hearing loss with pure-tone threshold (PTA) data were selected. Eligible studies regarding the effects of NAC treatment on patients with hearing loss were collected by two independent reviewers. A total of 1197 individuals were included from seven published studies. Two studies reported data for a sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SISNHL) group. Three studies reported data for a NIHL group. Other studies reported data for drug-induced hearing loss. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the overall effect of NAC treatment on sensorineural hearing loss was invalid. However, NAC treatment was linked with improved patient outcomes of hearing tests in cases of sudden hearing loss, but did not prevent hearing loss induced by noise or ototoxicity. However, there is a need for better-designed studies with larger samples to further prove the correlation between the effect of NAC and hearing loss.

Indexed as

Hearing lossMeta‐analysisN‐acetyl‐cysteine

Identifiers

PMID36159904
PMCPMC9479481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.