Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Harmonization and qualification of an IFN-γ Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay (ELISPOT) to measure influenza-specific cell-mediated immunity within the FLUCOP consortium.

Gwenn Waerlop, Geert Leroux-Roels, Teresa Lambe, Duncan Bellamy, Donata Medaglini, Elena Pettini, Rebecca Jane Cox, Mai-Chi Trieu, Richard Davies, Geir Bredholt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gwenn WaerlopCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Geert Leroux-RoelsCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Teresa LambeNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Duncan BellamyNuffield Department of Medicine, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Donata MedagliniLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Elena PettiniLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Rebecca Jane CoxInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mai-Chi TrieuInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Richard DaviesInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Geir BredholtInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Emanuele MontomoliDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Elena GianchecchiVisMederi srl, Siena, Italy.
Frédéric ClementCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza continues to be the most important cause of viral respiratory disease, despite the availability of vaccines. Today's evaluation of influenza vaccines mainly focuses on the quantitative and functional analyses of antibodies to the surface proteins haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). However, there is an increasing interest in measuring cellular immune responses targeting not only mutation-prone surface HA and NA but also conserved internal proteins as these are less explored yet potential correlates of protection. To date, laboratories that monitor cellular immune responses use a variety of in-house procedures. This generates diverging results, complicates interlaboratory comparisons, and hampers influenza vaccine evaluation. The European FLUCOP project aims to develop and standardize assays for the assessment of influenza vaccine correlates of protection. This report describes the harmonization and qualification of the influenza-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay. Initially, two pilot studies were conducted to identify sources of variability during sample analysis and spot enumeration in order to develop a harmonized Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Subsequently, an assay qualification study was performed to investigate the linearity, intermediate precision (reproducibility), repeatability, specificity, Lower and Upper Limits of Quantification (LLOQ-ULOQ), Limit of Detection (LOD) and the stability of signal over time. We were able to demonstrate that the FLUCOP harmonized IFN-γ ELISpot assay procedure can accurately enumerate IFN-γ secreting cells in the analytical range of 34.4 Spot Forming Units (SFU) per million cells up to the technical limit of the used reader and in the linear range from 120 000 to 360 000 cells per well, in plates stored up to 6 weeks after development. This IFN-γ ELISpot procedure will hopefully become a useful and reliable tool to investigate influenza-specific cellular immune responses induced by natural infection or vaccination and can be an additional instrument in the search for novel correlates of protection.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayHemagglutininsHumansImmunity, CellularInterferon-gammaMembrane ProteinsNeuraminidaseReproducibility of ResultsHemagglutininsInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaMembrane ProteinsNeuraminidaseassay harmonizationassay qualificationcell-mediated immunityIFN-γ ELISpotinfluenza

Identifiers

PMID36159843
PMCPMC9493492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.