ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Oblique impact responses of Hybrid III and a new headform with more biofidelic coefficient of friction and moments of inertia.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Industrial Helmets Protect the Head in Simulated Falls and Trips?Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Development of a Fall-Specific Impact Testing Method to Evaluate Safety Helmet Performance and Injury Risk.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Superior linear and comparable rotational protection of an air-filled helmet versus foam helmets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peaks and Distributions of White Matter Tract-related Strains in Bicycle Helmeted Impacts: Implication for Helmet Ranking and Optimization.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A biomechanical study of neck strength and impact dynamics on head and neck injury parameters.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- How Well Do Popular Bicycle Helmets Protect from Different Types of Head Injury?Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Head Impact Location, Speed and Angle from Falls and Trips in the Workplace.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The Influence of Headform Friction and Inertial Properties on Oblique Impact Helmet Testing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Quantitative analysis of the protective performance of bicycle helmet with multi-direction impact protection system in oblique impact tests.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024Article
- An Instrumented Mouthguard for Real-Time Measurement of Head Kinematics under a Large Range of Sport Specific Accelerations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Research on the Measurement Technology of Rotational Inertia of Rigid Body Based on the Principles of Monocular Vision and Torsion Pendulum.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In-Depth Bicycle Collision Reconstruction: From a Crash Helmet to Brain Injury Evaluation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New oblique impact methods for evaluating head injury mitigation effects of helmets are emerging, which mandate measuring both translational and rotational kinematics of the headform. These methods need headforms with biofidelic mass, moments of inertia (MoIs), and coefficient of friction (CoF). To fulfill this need, working group 11 of the European standardization head protection committee (CEN/TC158) has been working on the development of a new headform with realistic MoIs and CoF, based on recent biomechanics research on the human head. In this study, we used a version of this headform (Cellbond) to test a motorcycle helmet under the oblique impact at 8 m/s at five different locations. We also used the Hybrid III headform, which is commonly used in the helmet oblique impact. We tested whether there is a difference between the predictions of the headforms in terms of injury metrics based on head kinematics, including peak translational and rotational acceleration, peak rotational velocity, and BrIC (brain injury criterion). We also used the Imperial College finite element model of the human head to predict the strain and strain rate across the brain and tested whether there is a difference between the headforms in terms of the predicted strain and strain rate. We found that the Cellbond headform produced similar or higher peak translational accelerations depending on the impact location (-3.2% in the front-side impact to 24.3% in the rear impact). The Cellbond headform, however, produced significantly lower peak rotational acceleration (-41.8% in a rear impact to -62.7% in a side impact), peak rotational velocity (-29.5% in a side impact to -47.6% in a rear impact), and BrIC (-29% in a rear-side impact to -45.3% in a rear impact). The 90th percentile values of the maximum brain strain and strain rate were also significantly lower using this headform. Our results suggest that MoIs and CoF have significant effects on headform rotational kinematics, and consequently brain deformation, during the helmeted oblique impact. Future helmet standards and rating methods should use headforms with realistic MoIs and CoF (e.g., the Cellbond headform) to ensure more accurate representation of the head in laboratory impact tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.