Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159574›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Insulin Administration and Blood Glucose Monitoring Methods in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children.

Qian Deng, Yuqing Chen, Xin Wang, Wenjuan Cai, Yanping Han, Juanjuan Wang

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qian DengEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-888X
Yuqing ChenEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7161-3910
Xin WangEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.
Wenjuan CaiEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.
Yanping HanEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.
Juanjuan WangEndocrine Metabolism Department, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei 23000, Anhui, China.
Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of different insulin administration methods and blood glucose monitoring methods in treating type 1 diabetes mellitus in children. Methods: Patients were divided into four groups: multiple daily injection (MDI) + fingertip blood glucose detection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) + fingertip blood glucose detection, MDI + continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), and CSII + CGMS. After six months of treatment, followed by telephone and at least once a month in an outpatient clinic, insulin doses were adjusted according to the children's blood glucose levels. Blood glucose control and the daily dose of insulin were compared among the four groups after treatment, and the incidence of hypoglycemia in each group was recorded during the treatment. We also compare the incidence of the adverse event among the four groups. Results: 6 months later, the levels of HbA1c, FBG, and two h PG in each group were lower than those before treatment. There were significant differences in HbA1c, two h PG, and the daily insulin dose among the four groups. There were differences in the frequency of hypoglycemia among all the groups. The frequency of hypoglycemia in groups C and D was lower than in group A. Conclusions: CSII was better than MDI, and the blood glucose monitoring effect of CGMS was better than the fingertip blood glucose detection. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the best clinical efficacy. The patients treated with CSII combined with CGMS had the lowest adverse events incidence.

Identifiers

PMID36159574
PMCPMC9492361
OpenAlexW4295780619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.