Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Assessment of nutritional status of oncology patients at hospital admission: A Portuguese real-world study.

Carolina Trabulo, Joana Lopes, David da Silva Dias, João Gramaça, Isabel Fernandes, Rita Gameiro, Idília Pina, Antti Mäkitie, Faith Ottery, Paula Ravasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Screening, identification, and diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A retrospective cohort study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The relationship between nutritional status and prognosis in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients in palliative care: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carolina TrabuloCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Joana LopesCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
David da Silva DiasCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.
João GramaçaCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Isabel FernandesCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Rita GameiroCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Idília PinaCentro Hospitalar do Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Antti MäkitieCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Faith OtteryDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Paula RavascoCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nutritional status in patients with cancer has a determining role in the evolution of the disease and tolerance to treatments. Severity of undernutrition impacts morbidity and mortality in cancer patients and can limit patient response to the optimal therapies if nutritional issues are not appropriately addressed and managed. Despite the importance of malnutrition for the clinical evolution of oncology patients, there is not yet a universally accepted standard method for evaluating malnutrition in such patients. The aim of this study was to stratify the nutritional status of inpatients at an Oncology Department. Methods: This is an observational study with 561 cancer patients, assessed at admission to a Medical Oncology Department from November 2016 to February 2020. All patients were considered eligible. Non-compliant and/or comatose patients were excluded. Nutritional status was assessed using the PG-SGA, BMI classified with the WHO criteria, and calculation of the percentage of weight loss in the previous 3-6 months. Results: A total of 561 patients (303 F: 258 M; mean age 65 ± 13 years) were included. One-third of the patients, n=191/561 (34%), lost 6% of their weight in the month prior to admission and 297/561 (53%) patients lost 10.2% of weight in the previous 6 months. Mean BMI was 24.1 ± 5.8 kg/m Conclusion: In this oncological setting, a higher proportion of patients were nutritionally-at-risk or with moderate/severe malnutrition. The large majority of patients in this study presented with a critical need for nutritional intervention. These findings highlight the need for an integrated assessment of nutritional status at patient referral. This will allow early and timely nutrition care, which is recommended to prevent or reverse further deterioration of the condition and to optimize treatment administration.

Indexed as

cancermalnutritionnutritional assessmentoncologypatient admissionscored patient-generated subjective global assessmentsubjective global assessment (SGA)

Identifiers

PMID36159492
PMCPMC9500582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.