Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2022

From nociception to pain perception, possible implications of astrocytes.

Frida Higinio-Rodríguez, Angélica Rivera-Villaseñor, Isnarhazni Calero-Vargas, Mónica López-Hidalgo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Shoulder pain: to image or not to image?Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frida Higinio-RodríguezEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.
Angélica Rivera-VillaseñorEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.
Isnarhazni Calero-VargasEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.
Mónica López-HidalgoEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are determinants for the functioning of the CNS. They respond to neuronal activity with calcium increases and can in turn modulate synaptic transmission, brain plasticity as well as cognitive processes. Astrocytes display sensory-evoked calcium responses in different brain structures related to the discriminative system of most sensory modalities. In particular, noxious stimulation evoked calcium responses in astrocytes in the spinal cord, the hippocampus, and the somatosensory cortex. However, it is not clear if astrocytes are involved in pain. Pain is a private, personal, and complex experience that warns us about potential tissue damage. It is a perception that is not linearly associated with the amount of tissue damage or nociception; instead, it is constructed with sensory, cognitive, and affective components and depends on our previous experiences. However, it is not fully understood how pain is created from nociception. In this perspective article, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and neuronal networks that underlie the perception of pain. Then we proposed that coherent activity of astrocytes in the spinal cord and pain-related brain areas could be important in binding sensory, affective, and cognitive information on a slower time scale.

Indexed as

astrocytescalcium activitynociceptionpainperceptionsensory

Identifiers

PMID36159392
PMCPMC9492445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.