ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals (trace elements) in coastal soils of southwest Iran.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metals and Geochemical Indexes in Sediments of a Karstic Coastal Tropical Lagoon: Evaluating the Ecological Risk in Celestun, Yucatan, Mexico.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2026Article
- Potential Ecological Risk Index and Metal Fate in a Karstic Tropical Lagoon: Chelem, Yucatan, Mexico.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Health Risk and Heavy Metal Pollution Caused by Dust Storms in Zabol City.Biological trace element research · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of heavy metal contamination in groundwater of rural areas of Kurdistan Province Iran: A comprehensive study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Analysis of physicochemical attributes, contamination level of trace metals and assessment of health risk in mango fruits from Southern region Ethiopia.Toxicology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metal pollution has become one of the most important threats that can endanger the health of animals, the environment, and humans. The present study was performed to investigate the potential ecological risk (PER) of heavy metals [zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), molybdenum (Mo), manganese (Mn), and selenium (Se)] in the coastal soils of southwest Iran in 2019. The samples were collected from six soil sites and three depth intervals (0-15, 15-30, and 30-45 cm) among bare and vegetated coastal soils. The soil samples to study the soil properties (soil grain size, pH, EC, and soil organic carbon) and metal contamination were taken from soil (36 samples), water (6 samples), and plants (24 samples). The soil ecological risk (ER), the pollution load index (PLI), contamination degree (Cdeg), modified contamination degree (mCdeg) for heavy metal contamination in the soil, and enrichment factor (EF index) indicate the origin of metals entering the environment, and hence these parameters were investigated. The results of this study showed that the levels of Zn, Cu, Co, Mn, Se, and Mo were in the range of low-risk contaminants in this region. According to the results of the study, the risk index (RI) for metals was in the range of 1.296-3.845, which is much lower than 150, and therefore the ecological risk potential calculated in this study was in the low-risk category for toxic elements. Based on the results, it was found that agricultural, industrial, and human activities played an effective role in the accumulation of Zn, Cu, Co, Se, and Mo in the soil. In addition, the main source of Mn metal is believed to be natural due to geological activities in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.