Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159218›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2022

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in multimodal therapy for patients with oligometastatic peritoneal gastric cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III trial PIPAC VEROne.

Francesco Casella, Maria Bencivenga, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Romario Fumagalli, Daniele Marrelli, Fabio Pacelli, Antonio Macrì, Annibale Donini, Lorena Torroni, Michele Pavarana and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco CasellaDepartment and of Surgical, General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Odontostomatologic, Maternal and Child Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria BencivengaDepartment and of Surgical, General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Odontostomatologic, Maternal and Child Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo RosatiDepartment of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-salute University, Milan, Italy.
Uberto Romario FumagalliDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Daniele MarrelliDepartment of Surgery, Siena University Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Fabio PacelliSurgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio MacrìPeritoneal Surface Malignancy and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Program, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Annibale DoniniGeneral and Emergency Surgery, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Lorena TorroniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele PavaranaDepartment of Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni De ManzoniDepartment and of Surgical, General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Odontostomatologic, Maternal and Child Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most frequent site of metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Current standard treatment is palliative systemic chemotherapy with very poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) resulted in long-term benefits in selected patients. Among patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a distinctive subset is oligometastatic disease which is characterized by low metastatic burden. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recent technique of intraperitoneal chemotherapy used in combination with systemic chemotherapy with promising results. Methods: PIPAC VER-One is a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of PIPAC in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer and synchronous positive peritoneal cytology and/or limited peritoneal metastases (peritoneal cancer index [PCI] ≤6). Patients will be randomized into two arms: arm A (control) treated with standard systemic chemotherapy and arm B (experimental) treated with a bidirectional scheme including PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy. Results: Primary endpoint is the secondary resectability rate. Secondary endpoints are: overall survival (OS), pregression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), histological response assessed both on primary tumor and peritoneal lesions, quality of life (QoL), complication rate (CTCAE v5), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Conclusions: The role of PIPAC in multimodal treatment for oligometastatic gastric cancer will be investigated in this trial.

Indexed as

gastric cancerintraperitoneal chemotherapyperitoneal metastasesPIPACsystemic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36159218
PMCPMC9467896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.